4.1 Article

Valsartan-induced cardioprotection involves angiotensin II type 2 receptor upregulation in isolated ischaemia and reperfused rat hearts

期刊

ACTA CARDIOLOGICA
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 67-72

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/AC.70.1.3064595

关键词

Angiotensin II; receptors; valsartan; ischaemia-reperfusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R) antagonist protects the heart against acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury. The underlying mechanism is unclear.To determine the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade, valsartan on AT(1) and AT(2) receptor during ischaemia reperfusion in isolated rat, the hearts of 24 SD rats were isolated, linked to Langendorff perfusion apparatus, and exposed to ischaemia for 30 min. The left ventricular systolic pressure, maximal uprising velocity of left ventricular pressure (+dp/dt(max)), maximal decreasing velocity of left ventricular pressure (-dp/dt(max)) and coronary flow were measured after stabilization of the perfusion. The isoenzyme of creatine kinase in the effluent liquid from the heart, AT(1) and AT(2) receptor mRNA and protein expression were measured after stabilization of the perfusion. The results showed that ischaemia-reperfusion induced a marked decrease in left ventricular systolic pressure, +dp/dt(max) and -dp/dt(max), indicating severe cardiac dysfunction and decreased coronary effluence. Concurrently, myocardial AT(1) and AT (2) receptor mRNA and protein expression were increased with valsartan. However, AT(2) receptor mRNA and protein expression decreased during ischaemia-reperfusion. The creatine kinase levels at different time points of the valsartan group were significantly lower. The results suggested that valsartan improved left ventricular function and increased coronary effluence because the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan induced cardioprotection associated with upregulating AT(2) receptor protein and mRNA expression after ischaemia-reperfusion in isolated rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据