4.6 Article

Photophysical Properties of Doped Carbon Dots (N, P, and B) and Their Influence on Electron/Hole Transfer in Carbon Dots-Nickel (II) Phthalocyanine Conjugates

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 34, 页码 20034-20041

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp507080c

关键词

-

资金

  1. DAE-SRC Outstanding Investigator Award
  2. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping in carbon nanomaterial with various hetero atoms draws attention due to their tunable properties. Herein, we have synthesized nitrogen containing carbon dots [C-dots (N)], phosphorus co-doped nitrogen containing carbon dots [C-dots (N, P)], and boron co-doped nitrogen containing carbon dots [C-dots (N, B)]; and detailed elemental analysis has been unveiled by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Our emphasis is given to understand the effect of doping on the photophysical behavior of carbon dots by using steady-state and time-resolved spectroscopy. Nitrogen containing carbon dots have quantum yield (QY) of 64.0% with an average decay time of 12.8 ns. Photophysical properties (radiative decay rate and average decay time) are found to be increased for phosphorus co-doping carbon dots due to extra electron incorporation for n-type doping (phosphorus dopant) to carbon dots which favors the radiative relaxation pathways. On the contrary, boron (p-type dopant) co-doping with nitrogen containing carbon dots favors the nonradiative electron-hole recombination pathways due to incorporation of excess hole; as a result QY, radiative rate, and average decay time are decreased. To understand the effect of doping on charge transfer phenomena, we have attached nickel (II) phthalocyanine on the surface of C-dots. It is seen that phosphorus co-doping carbon dots accelerates the electron transfer process from carbon dots to phthalocyanine. In contrast, after boron co-doping in carbon dots, the electron transfer process slows down and a simultaneous hole transfer process occurs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据