4.6 Article

Computational Study on the Interaction of Modified Nucleobases with Graphene and Doped Graphenes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 29, 页码 16165-16174

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp503126q

关键词

-

资金

  1. Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Mumbai, India
  2. Nanomaterial Safety, Health and Environment project - Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, India [NanoSHE BSC0112]
  3. Department of Sceince and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between graphene-based nanomaterials and modified nucleobases (MBs) is important in the development and design of new biosensors. The adsorption of MBs on the surface of graphene (G), boron-doped graphene (BG), nitrogen-doped graphene (NG), and silicon-doped graphene (SiG) has been investigated using electronic structure calculations and associated analysis methods. It is found from the calculations that the MBs stack with the surface of G, BG, NG, and SiG models and that the pi-pi stacking interaction plays a dominant role in the stabilization of the intermolecular complexes. The stability of MBs on the surface of SiG is the highest when compared to that of G, BG, and NG models. The highest interaction energies of MBs with SiG is due to the presence of Si center dot center dot center dot O(N) and pi-pi stacking interactions. The theory of atoms in molecules (AIM) analysis indicates that Si center dot center dot center dot O(N) interaction has both electrostatic and covalent characters. The calculation of charge transfer by employing the natural bond orbital method showed the donor nature of MBs. It is also found that the variations in the density of states and highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital gap of SiG occur upon adsorption of MBs. These results illustrate that SiG can act as a sensor for the detection of MBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据