4.6 Article

Size Affects the Stability of the Photoacoustic Conversion of Gold Nanorods

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 29, 页码 16140-16146

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp502647p

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health Board of the Tuscany Region, NANO-CHROM
  2. Health Board of the Tuscany Region, IPERNANO
  3. Health Board of the Tuscany Region, SINERGY

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gold nanorods exhibit intense optical absorption bands in the near-infrared region of principal interest for applications in biomedical optics, which originate from sharp plasmon resonances. This high absorbance, combined with the biochemical inertness and targetability of gold nanoparticles, makes these materials excellent candidates to provide contrast in photoacoustic imaging and for other applications such as the selective hyperthermia of cancer. One issue demoting the potential of gold nanorods as contrast agents in photoacoustic applications is their limited photostability, which falls below relevant permissible exposure limits. In particular, when gold nanorods are resonantly excited by laser pulses in the nanosecond duration regime, there may occur phenomena like reshaping into rounder nanoparticles as well as fragmentation and sublimation, which modify their optical absorption bands and hinder their efficiency of photoacoustic conversion. Here we investigate the influence of nanoparticle size on the photostability and reproducibility of photoacoustic conversion of gold nanorods embedded in biomimetic phantoms. We compare samples containing gold nanorods with different sizes but the same shapes and overall optical densities. We demonstrate clear size effects as the thresholds of optical fluences for nanoparticle deformation improve from below 2 to above 6 mJ/cm(2) with nanoparticle miniaturization from 22 to 5 nm effective radii. We interpret these results in terms of a better thermal coupling and faster heat dissipation from smaller nanopartides to their environment, originating from their larger specific surface area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据