4.6 Article

Reactive Landing of Dendrimer Ions onto Activated Self-Assembled Monolayer Surfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 5, 页码 2602-2608

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp411637w

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences & Biosciences Division
  2. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reactivity of gaseous, amine-terminated polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer ions with activated self-assembled monolayer (SAM) surfaces terminated with N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester groups (NHS-SAM) is examined using mass-selected ion deposition combined with in situ infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy. The reaction extent is determined from depletion of the infrared band at 1753 cm(-1), corresponding to the stretching vibration of the NHS carbonyl groups following ion deposition. For reaction yields below 10%, NHS band depletion follows a linear dependence on the ion dose. By comparing the kinetics plots obtained for 1,12-dodecanediamine and different generations of dendrimer ions (G(0)-G(3)) containing 4, 8, 16, and 32 terminal amino groups, we demonstrate that the relative reaction efficiency increases linearly with the number of NH2 groups in the molecule. This finding is rationalized assuming the formation of multiple amide bonds upon collision of higher-generation dendrimers with NHS-SAM. Furthermore, by comparing the NHS band depletion following deposition of [M+4H](4+) ions of the G(2) dendrimer at 30, 80, and 120 eV, we demonstrate that the ion's kinetic energy has no measurable effect on reaction efficiency. Similarly, the ion's charge state only has a minor effect on the reactive landing efficiency of dendrimer ions. Our results indicate that reactive landing is an efficient approach for highly selective covalent immobilization of complex multifunctional molecules onto organic surfaces terminated with labile functional groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据