4.6 Article

Unraveling the Factors That Control Soft Landing of Small Silyl Ions on Fluorinated Self-Assembled Monolayers

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 19, 页码 10159-10169

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp501841a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTQ2009-12588]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [VP1-2012-013]
  3. National Science Foundation under the Partnership in International Research and Education (PIRE) Grant [OISE-0730114]
  4. Robert A. Welch Foundation [D-0005]
  5. [FIS2010-15127]
  6. [CTQ2010-17006]
  7. [NANOBIOMAGNET S2009/MAT1726]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamics simulations were performed to study soft landing of SiNCS+ and (CH3)(2)SiNCS+ ions on a self-assembled monolayer of perfluorinated alkanethiols on gold (F-SAM). Using classical trajectories, the short-time collision dynamics (picosecond scale) were investigated to analyze trapping probabilities for these silyl ions. Thermal desorption of trapped ions was simulated by using boxed molecular dynamics (BXD). The simulations predict substantial ion trapping in the collisions of these ions with the F-SAM, especially when the projectile's incident direction is normal to the surface. Desorption of the SiNCS+ ion occurs significantly faster than desorption of the methylated ion, which may explain why soft landing was experimentally observed for the latter ion only [Miller, S. A.; Luo, H.; Pachuta, S. J.; Cooks, R. G. Science 1997, 275, 1447-1450; Luo, H.; Miller, S. A.; Cooks, R. G.; Pachuta, S. J. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Processes 1998, 174, 193-217]. The free energy profiles for desorption of these ions show minima at Is A above the gold slab, indicating that the silyl ion has a preference to reside on top of the monolayer. Deep penetration of the ion into the monolayer is prevented by a large free energy barrier. However, according to DFT calculations, if this process occurred, the SiNCS+ ion could strongly bind to the Au(111) surface that supports the perfluorinated alkanethiol chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据