4.6 Article

Room-Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Batteries with Liquid-Phase Sodium Polysulfide Catholytes and Binder-Free Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Fabric Electrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 40, 页码 22952-22959

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp507655u

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-SC0005397]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charge/discharge of a room-temperature sodium-sulfur (Na-S) battery involves redox processes of a series of long-chain soluble sodium polysulfides (Na2Sn, 4 <= n <= 8). By taking advantage of this, a room-temperature Na-S battery is developed with dissolved sodium polysulfide catholyte and a free-standing, binder-free multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) fabric electrode. Use of liquid phase sodium polysulfide as a cathode not only provides a facile dispersion and homogeneous distribution of the sulfur active material into the conductive matrix but also supplies a unique approach to mechanistically understand the ambient-temperature Na-S battery system. With the intermediate products (polysulfides) as the starting cathode, the electrochemical characteristics of the Na-S battery in the lower voltage-plateau region can be readily studied without the impact from the transformation process of elemental sulfur into long-chain sodium polysulfides. The nanostructured free-standing MWCNT fabric electrode in this battery system acts as a high-surface current collector. In comparison with the traditional solid sulfur-carbon composite cathode, the sodium polysulfide/MWCNT fabric cathode provides higher active material utilization and capacity retention during cycling. Electrochemical studies reveal that the transition of the low-ordered sodium polysulfides (or disulfide) is mostly responsible for the capacity fade during cycling. Operation of the cells with the sulfur/dissolved sodium polysulfide redox couple provides a stable output capacity/energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据