4.6 Article

The Electrical Double Layer of Dicationic Ionic Liquids at Onion-like Carbon Surface

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 8, 页码 3901-3909

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp409888f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures, and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrical double layer (EDL) structure formed by ions at a charged surface, which is the key to determining the performance of supercapacitors, has been extensively studied for many monocationic ionic liquids (MILs). However, it is not known what effect replacing MILs with dicationic ionic liquids (DILs) will have on the EDL structure. In this work, the interfacial structure and electrochemical performance of DILs [C-n(mim)(2)](BF4)(2) (n = 3, 6, 9) and [C-6(mim)(2)](Tf2N)(2) were investigated using classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulation for comparison with their monocationic counterparts. Different EDL structures formed by DILs and MILs near an onion-like carbon (OLC) electrode were observed. The interfacial orientation of the imidazolium plane in dications was verified to be similar to that of monocations. Moreover, the dissimilar sizes of the cation/anion and the specific ion adsorption on OLC were found to contribute to the distinctive shape of the differential capacitance-electric potential (C-V) curves, which were also dependent on the type of anions. Increased capacitance in BF4-containing DILs was not observed in comparison with their counterpart MILs, whereas dicationic [C-6(mim)(2)](Tf2N)(2) yielded higher differential capacitance in contrast to monocationic [C(6)mim][Tf2N], which was substantiated by cyclic voltammetry measurements as well. This work provides molecular insights into the EDL structure and C-V curves of imidazolium-based DILs in OLC-based supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据