4.6 Article

Measurement of Interlayer Screening Length of Layered Graphene by Plasmonic Nanostructure Resonances

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 43, 页码 22211-22217

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp312363x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [AFOSR-NSSEFF-FA9550-10-1-0195]
  3. postdoctoral research abroad program
  4. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC100-2917-I-564-056, NCS 101-2218-E-008-014-MY2, NSC 100-2628-E-009-023-MY3]
  5. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The variation in localized surface plasmon resonances of single Au nanodisks (diameter 100 nm and height 25 nm) on 0-13 graphene layers is investigated using dark-field scattering spectroscopy to obtain the graphene electric field screening length. For nanodisks (NDs) with and without underlying graphene layers on a SiO2 (300 nm)/Si substrate, the plasmon resonance red shifts from 604 to 620 nm with increasing graphene layers. The spectra of the plasmonic nanostructures obey an exponential saturation function versus increasing number of layers of graphene from 0 to 13. As a conducting film, the graphene layers screen the electric field generated by the plasmonic resonance of the Au NDs in the vicinity of the interface, and the red shifts of the resonance wavelength are explained in the framework of the electromagnetic field coupling between in-plane antiparallel image dipoles in the graphene layers and the ND dipole. A screening length of 1.2 +/- 0.2 nm, equivalent to 3-4 graphene layers, is experimentally obtained, in good agreement with the measurement by field-effect transistors and theoretical calculation in doped graphene. The resonance shift of plasmonic nanostructures on a layered graphene system provides an alternative and convenient method for screening length measurement of graphene films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据