4.6 Article

High-Loading Cobalt Oxide Coupled with Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for Oxygen Reduction in Anion-Exchange-Membrane Alkaline Fuel Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 17, 页码 8697-8707

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp401814f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory Early Career Laboratory-Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new nanocomposite catalyst consisting of high loading cobalt oxide (CoO) on nitrogen doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO) for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was prepared in this work Its high activity for the ORR in alkaline electrolyte was determined using the rotating disk electrode technique, and further confirmed in real alkaline membrane fuel cells. A combination of physicochemical characterization (e.g., X-ray absorption and X-ray photoelectron spectra) and density functional theory (DFT) calculation suggests that cobalt(II) cations in the composite catalyst may coordinate with the pyridinic nitrogen atoms doped into graphene planes, most likely the active species for the ORR Especially, the DFT calculations indicate that a stable rGO(N)-Co(II)-O-Co(II)-rGO(N) structure can be formed in the nitrogen-doped graphene catalist. Kinetic parameter analysis shows a high selectivity of four electron reduction on the composite catalyst during the ORR with an average electron transfer number of 3.75. A synergistic effect between the rGO(N) and CoO may exist, yielding a much higher catalytic activity on the CoO/rGO(N) catalyst, compared to either rGO(N) or CoO controls. The novel synthesis procedure utilizing rGO(N) to further couple Co(II) yields a high loading of Co species (24.7 wt %). Thus, a relatively thinner cathode in fuel cell can accommodate more active Co species and facilitate O-2 transfer. Due to the high intrinsic activity and efficient mass transport, the CoO-rGO(N) ORR catalyst achieved approaching performance to state-of-the-art Pt/C cathodes in anion-exchange-membrane alkaline fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据