4.6 Article

Redox State Sensitive Spectroscopy of the Model Compound [(H-dcbpy)2RuII(NCS)2]2- (dcbpy=2,2′-Bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylato)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 13, 页码 6669-6677

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp400193k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Thuringer Ministerium fur Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur [B514-09049, 2011 FE9096]
  2. Fonds der chemischen Industrie
  3. European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The charge transfer reaction mechanism in a ruthenium polypyridine model complex with isothiocyanato ligands, i.e., [(H-dcbpy)(2)Ru(NCS)(2)](2-) 2Bu(4)N(+) (Ru2H) (dcbpy = 2,2'-bipyridine-4,4'-dicarboxylato), has been investigated by combining UV-vis absorption, resonance Raman spectroscopy, and electrochemical methods. Understanding the photophysics of light-harvesting complexes of this class is an indispensable prerequisite to improve the efficiency and durability of photocatalysts for hydrogen production, a possible basis of future energy sources. In this study, light-induced excitation of Ru2H has been mimicked by electrochemical reduction, and the intermediate redox state has been extensively characterized by UV-vis absorption and resonance Raman spectroscopy. The reduction occurs at the dcbpy ligand, and the spectra of reduced Ru2H resemble the excited state spectra. The reduced Ru2H exhibits a new absorption band at 440 nm localized at the bipyridine framework. This assignment is consistent with the observed enhancement of the bipyridine bands with respect to nonreduced Ru2H in the resonance Raman spectra of the reduced Ru2H excited at 458 nm. The detected shifts in Raman band positions and changes in the relative band intensities between nonreduced and reduced Ru2H are rationalized on an orbital level by quantum chemical calculations. The results indicate that the reduction is accompanied by deprotonation, i.e., an intramolecular electron-transfer-induced cleavage of the O-H bond splitting off hydrogen, of the carboxylic acid groups of the dcbpy ligand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据