4.6 Article

Solvent Effect of Room Temperature Ionic Liquids on Electrochemical Reactions in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 9, 页码 4431-4440

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp400153m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program (ALCA) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23245046] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL), N,N-diethyl-Nmethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide aDEMENTESAD, was used as an electrolyte solvent for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. Li[TFSA] was dissolved into [DEME] [TESA] to prepare the electrolytes, and a molecular solvent tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME) was used for Li[TESA] as a reference. Discharge-charge tests of Li-S cells using these electrolytes were carried out. The discharge-charge cycle stability and Coulombic efficiency of a cell with an RTIL electrolyte were found to be surprisingly superior to those of a cell with TEGDME electrolyte. The poor cycle stability of the cell with the TEGDME electrolyte was attributed to the dissolution of lithium polysulfides (Li2Sm), which were generated as reaction intermediates through a redox process at the S cathode in the Li-S cell. RTIL has low donor ability owing to the weak Lewis basicity of [TESA](-) anion, whereas conventional ether-based molecular solvents such as TEGDME have high donor ability. The dissolution of Li2Sm was significantly suppressed owing to the weak donor ability of RTIL. In the RTIL electrolyte, Li2Sm was immobilized on the electrode, and the electrochemical reaction of the S species occurred exdusively in the solid phase. These results clearly prove a novel solvent effect of RTILs on the electrochemical reactions of the S cathode in Li-S cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据