4.6 Article

Ultrasonication Induces Oxygenated Species and Defects onto Exfoliated Graphene

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 44, 页码 23272-23278

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp4057048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology and the European Commission
  2. NSRF action Development of Research Centers KPHPiISigma
  3. Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS) under FRFC [2.4577.11]
  4. COST action [MP0901]
  5. European Research Council under the 7th Framework Program (FP7) ERC [246791]
  6. project New Multifunctional Nanostructured Materials and Devices POLYNANO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of ultrasonication parameters, such as time and power applied, to exfoliate graphite in o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and N-methyl-1,2-pyrrolidone (NMP) was examined. It was found that the concentration of graphene was higher in o-DCB, while its dispersibility was increased when sonication was applied for a longer period and/or at higher power. However, spectroscopic examination by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed that ultrasonication causes defects and induces oxygen functional groups in the form of carboxylic acids and ethers/epoxides onto the graphene lattice. Additional proof for the latter arose from Raman, IR, and thermogravimetry studies. The carboxylic acids and ethers/epoxides onto exfoliated graphene were derived from air during ultrasonication and found independent of the solvent used for the exfoliation and the power and/or time ultrasonication applied. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of oxygenated species present on exfoliated graphene as performed by high-resolution XPS revealed that the relative oxygen percentage was higher when exfoliation was performed in NMP. Finally, the sonication time and/or power affected the oxygen content on exfoliated graphene, since extended ultrasonication resulted in a decrease in the oxygen content on exfoliated graphene, with a simultaneous increase of defected sp(3) carbon atoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据