4.6 Article

Evaporation of Nanoparticle Droplets on Smooth Hydrophobic Surfaces: The Inner Coffee Ring Deposits

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 9, 页码 4707-4716

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3126939

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Queensland
  2. Australian Research Council [LP0989217]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0989217] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solid surfaces used in evaporation studies of nanoparticle sessile droplets usually exhibit significant surface roughness, causing significant pinning of the three-phase contact lines and producing different types of nanoparticle deposits, from single and multiple coffee rings (formed at the initial pining of triple contact lines) to central bumps. Here we used nanometer-scale smooth hydrophobic surfaces to investigate the evaporation of sessile water droplets containing silica nanoparticles and organic pigment nanoparticles. We observed a new type of coffee ring deposits which were not formed at the initial pinning but at the later pinning. We referred them to as the inner coffee ring deposits (ICRDs). The radius of ICRDs was smaller than the radius of the initially pinned contact area and increased with increasing concentration of added salts and nanoparticles and with increasing contact angle hysteresis of hydrophobic surfaces. We also observed different dendrite deposit patterns inside ICRDs. We argue that all the deposit patterns are due to the second pinning of the three-phase contact lines, which occur when the forces on particles are balanced. The hypothesis is further supported by the transient changes of the dynamic contact angles and contact base area radius. The contact angle hysteresis, the particle concentration, and the colloidal interaction forces such as the electrical double-layer forces play a vital role in determining the size and patterns of ICRDs and the evaporation kinetics of nanoparticle sessile droplets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据