4.6 Article

Structure of Stoichiometric and Oxygen-Rich Ultrathin FeO(111) Films Grown on Pd(111)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 29, 页码 15155-15163

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp4042638

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Research Agency
  2. Strategic Research Council
  3. Villum Kahn Rasmussen Foundation
  4. Lundbeck Foundation
  5. Carlsberg Foundation
  6. Haldor Topsoe
  7. European Research Council
  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences (DOE-BES), Division of Chemical Sciences
  9. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research located at PNNL
  10. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DEAC05-00OR22725, DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monolayer thin FeO(111) films were grown on Pd(111) and oxidized by atomic oxygen (O). The stoichiometric and oxidized films were studied in detail by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Compared to the previously studied FeO(111)/Pt(111) system, small structural differences were observed for stoichiometric FeO monolayer films. Upon O exposure, the stoichiometric FeO film reconstructs, leading to the formation of new O-rich structures incorporating increasing amounts of additional O atoms. At low O exposures, the STM images exhibit bright features of regularly sized triangular structures assigned to O-adatom dislocation loops. A model of this O-rich structure composed of four-fold O-coordinated Fe atoms is proposed and confirmed by DFT calculations. Furthermore, these O dislocation loops induce the inversion of the FeO film and enclose portions of the film in which the order of the high-symmetry domains is inverted. For higher O exposures, the formation of FeO2-x islands coexisting with O-adatom dislocations and stoichiometric FeO patches was observed. These FeO2-x islands are reminiscent of the O-rich structures previously reported for FeO supported on Pt(111) and are catalytically active toward CO oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据