4.6 Article

Fabrication of Covalently Functionalized Graphene Oxide Incorporated Solid-State Hybrid Silica Gel Glasses and Their Improved Nonlinear Optical Response

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 44, 页码 23108-23116

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp404463g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR, China [GRF PolyU 526511]
  2. Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund [ITS/035/12]
  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YM44]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) [2011AA010205]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61172010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state graphene oxide (GO) homogeneously incorporated silica gel glasses have been successfully fabricated, and the good nonlinear optical (NLO) response shown indicates its high potential as the optical limiting material to protect optical detectors and human eyes from damage caused by high power lasers. The GO sheets are covalently functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and connected to the silica glass matrix through Si-O bonding, resulting in an increase in GO incorporation concentration up to 20.2 mol % (C/SiO2) without reaching the saturation limit. Digital images and element mapping analysis of carbon have confirmed the homogeneous dispersion of GO in the silica gel glass. Because of the higher two-photon absorption coefficient, lower NLO starting threshold, and optical limiting threshold shown at 532 nm wavelength, the NLO performance at this wavelength is better than at 1064 nm. At an input fluence as low as 1.3 J cm(-2) at 532 nm and 2.3 J cm(-2) at 1064 nm, the glass incorporated with 5.1 mol % GO starts to exhibit an NLO response, suggesting its potential as a laser optical limiting absorber. In addition to the discussion of the probable reasons behind the phenomenon, it has been demonstrated for the first time that the NLO performance of GO in solid-state silica gel glass is stronger than in deionized water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据