4.6 Article

Significantly Accelerated Spherulitic Growth Rates for Semicrystalline Polymers through the Layer-by-Layer Film Method

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 11, 页码 5882-5893

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp400580r

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21174139]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB023901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of a molten liquid polymer layer on the crystallization of the beneath semicrystalline polymer has been seldom considered. In the study, the nucleation and growth of spherulites for the beneath polylactide (PLA) layer in poly(ethylene oxide)/polylactide (PEO/PLA) double-layer films during isothermal crystallization at various temperatures above the melting point of PEO have been investigated by using polarized optical microscopy, with the particular results compared with that for neat PLA and PLA/PEO blend films. It is interesting to find that the top covering molten PEO layer can greatly accelerate the spherulitic growth rate (G) of the beneath PLA layer. Another significant result is that the temperature for the measurable nucleation and spherulitic growth of PLA in the double-layer films can be eventually pushed down close to the glass transition temperature of neat PLA. The changes of glass transition temperature, T-g, for PEO/PLA multilayer films have been measured by using modulated differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis, which reveal slight decreases of T-g for PLA layer due to the influence of PEO layer. The layer structures of fractured surface of the double-layer films are analyzed on the basis of the observation from scanning electron microscopy, and the existence of interdiffusion areas with irregular boundary between PEO and PLA layers is the key clue to understanding the significant acceleration of G for PLA. The layer-by-layer film method infers promising applications, which might be considered to well replace the blending method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据