4.6 Article

Quantification of Resonance Raman Enhancement Factors for Rhodamine 6G (R6G) in Water and on Gold and Silver Nanoparticles: Implications for Single-Molecule R6G SERS

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 51, 页码 27096-27104

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp4105932

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CHE 1151057, EPS-0903787]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1151057] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resonance Raman (RR) enhancement factors of Rhodamine 6G (R6G) in water and on gold and silver nanoparticles (AuNPs and AgNPs) were determined using a double ratiometric method where adenine is used as the internal reference. The RR enhancement factor for R6G on AgNPs upon laser excitation at 532 nm is 537.6 +/- 214.8. This is similar to 5 times lower than the experimental (2.7 +/- 0.3) x 10(3) RR enhancement factor for R6G in water. These experimental RR enhancement factors for R6G in water and on AgNPs are 10(4) smaller than the 10(7) RR enhancement proposed in literature for R6G in water and on SERS substrates. In addition, a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation showed that even with this damped RR for R6G on AgNPs in comparison to R6G in water, a SERS enhancement factor of 10(6) is sufficient to explain the single-molecule resonance SERS activities reported for R6G located in nanoparticle junctions. This conclusion is deduced from fact that normal Raman spectrum could be readily obtained with 24 fmol of adenine at laser focal volume of similar to 150 fL at 532 nm excitation. This work provides the first direct experimental evidence for the recent theoretical predication that plasmonic nanoparticles quench the resonance Raman signal. In addition, the double ratiometric method reported in this work represents a significant technique development in Raman and SERS, which should pave the way for quantitative investigations of the RR for dye molecules dissolved in solution or adsorbed on plasmonic nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据