4.6 Article

The Effects of Hofmeister Cations at Negatively Charged Hydrophilic Surfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 9, 页码 5730-5734

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp210791j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0094332]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [A-1421]
  3. CONACYT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia) [210738]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work explores the interactions of cations with highly negatively charged solid/aqueous interfaces. Vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy (VSFS) was exploited to observe interfacial water structure on the surfaces of fused quartz and titanium dioxide (TiO2) in the presence of nine chloride salts with different alkali, alkaline earth, and transition metal cations. The results showed prominent specific cation effects at low concentration. The cations followed a direct Hofmeister series. On quartz surfaces the series was: Li+ > Cs+ > Rb+ > NH4+ > K+ > Na+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ > Zn2+. As such, Zn2+ attenuated water structure to the greatest degree and therefore gave rise to the smallest peaks in the OH stretch region of the VSFS spectrum. The opposite was the case for Li+. Such results indicate that Li+ partitioned least to the surface, while Zn2+ partioned there to the greatest extent. We also observed prominent specific cation effects on TiO2 surfaces. There were, however, some key differences between these surfaces. On TiO2, Li+, which is the best hydrated monovalent cation, behaved more similarly to K+ and Na+. In addition, the ordering of Mg2+ and Ca2+ was reversed on TiO2 compared with quartz. Such reordering of the Hofmeister series should result from differences in the charge density, polarizability, and basicity of the two oxide surfaces. Finally, NH4+ was found to interact more strongly with TiO2 than any other monovalent cation. This result is in line with the greater role that hydrogen bonding should play on TiO2 compared with quartz under the conditions of the experiment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据