4.6 Article

Enhanced Performance of CdS/CdSe Quantum Dot Cosensitized Solar Cells via Homogeneous Distribution of Quantum Dots in TiO2 Film

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 35, 页码 18655-18662

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3058838

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46467]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR 1035196]
  3. University of Washington TGIF grant
  4. Royalty Research Fund (RRF) from the Office of Research at University of Washington
  5. National Science Foundation of China [51004011, 51174247]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-12-153A]
  7. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090006120012]
  8. China Scholar-ship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thickness and porosity of TiO2 mesoporous film were optimized for better distribution of quantum dots to enhance the performance of CdS/CdSe quantum dot cosensitized solar cells. The CdS and CdSe quantum dots were prepared on TiO2 mesoporous film through a successive ion layer absorption and reaction (SILAR) method and a chemical bath deposition (CBD) method, respectively. It was found that the distribution of quantum dots was inhomogeneous from the surface to the interior of the TiO2 film, being mainly concentrated at the upper layer of the TiO2 film. As a result, simply increasing film thickness did not make significant contribution to improving solar cell efficiency since only a small portion of quantum dots might access the interior of the film, leading to an exposure of TiO2 nanoparticles in electrolyte and thus reducing the electron lifetime due to increased charge recombination rate. Our study revealed that the efficiency could reach its maximum, similar to 4.62%, with the TiO2 film, the thickness of which was around 11 mu m, and porosity was optimized by adding 12 wt % ethyl cellulose into the paste for making the TiO2 film.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据