4.6 Article

Anisotropic Shock Sensitivity of Cyclotrimethylene Trinitramine (RDX) from Compress-and-Shear Reactive Dynamics

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 18, 页码 10198-10206

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp300711m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-05-1-0778, N00014-09-1-0634]
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF-05-1-0345, W911NF-08-1-0124]
  3. Los Alamos National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We applied the compress-and-shear reactive dynamics (CS-RD) simulation model to study the anisotropic shock sensitivity of cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (RDX) crystals. We predict that, for mechanical shocks between 3 and 7 GPa, RDX is most sensitive to shocks perpendicular to the (100) and (210) planes, whereas it is insensitive for shocks perpendicular to the (120), (111), and (110) planes. These results are all consistent with available experimental information, further validating the CS-RD model for distinguishing between sensitive and insensitive shock directions. We find that, for sensitive directions, the shock impact triggers a slip system that leads to large shear stresses arising from steric hindrance, causing increased energy inputs that increase the temperature, leading to dramatically increased chemical reactions. Thus, our simulations demonstrate that the molecular origin of anisotropic shock sensitivity results from steric hindrance toward shearing of adjacent slip planes during shear deformation. Thus, strain energy density, temperature rise, and molecule decomposition are effective measures to distinguish anisotropic sensitivities. We should emphasize that CS-RD has been developed as a tool to distinguish rapidly (within a few picoseconds) between sensitive and insensitive shock directions of energetic materials. If the high stresses and rates used here continued much longer and for larger systems, it would ultimately result in detonation for all directions, but we have not demonstrated this.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据