4.6 Article

Comparative Guest, Thermal, and Mechanical Breathing of the Porous Metal Organic Framework MIL-53(Cr): A Computational Exploration Supported by Experiments

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 24, 页码 13289-13295

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp303686m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hubert Curien Cai Yuanpei program [24038XC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The breathing of the flexible metal organic framework MIL-53(Cr) has been widely explored by both experimental and modeling approaches upon the inclusion of different guest molecules within its porosity. This spectacular phenomenon has been only partially tackled by force field based simulations mainly due to the complexity of deriving a set of accurate potential parameters able to capture the associated structural transition implying a unit cell volume change up to 40%. Here, a new parametrization of a flexible force field for the MIL-53(Cr) framework is realized from an iterative procedure starting with the experimental structural data collected in the presence of CO2 as the guest molecule. Hybrid osmotic Monte Carlo simulations based on this refined force field are then successfully conducted to reproduce for the first time the complex shape of the CO2 adsorption isotherm in the whole range of pressures. The structural behavior of the MIL-53(Cr) under a wide range of applied temperature and pressure is then followed by molecular dynamics simulations. It is established that these two stimuli also induce a similar reversible structural transition toward a contracted phase, with the presence of a hysteresis. Each of these predictions is confirmed by experimental evidence issued from either the literature for the impact of the temperature or from our own high pressure neutron diffraction measurements. This permanent experimental/modeling interplay allows a full validation of the derived flexible force field, a prerequisite for further understanding the microscopic key features that govern the spectacular breathing of such a material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据