4.6 Article

Hole Transport in Nonstoichiometric and Doped Wustite

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 33, 页码 17403-17413

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3047664

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. DOD High Performance Computing Modernization Program at the AFRL DSRC
  5. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  6. European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [254227]
  7. Weizmann Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose ways to enhance the conductivity of wustite (i.e., naturally p-type FeO), a visible-light-absorbing, inexpensive, abundant, and nontoxic potential alternative material for solar energy conversion devices. Unfortunately, the conversion efficiency of FeO is inhibited by its low hole conductivity. Increasing the iron vacancy concentration or adding p-type dopants improves FeO conductivity by increasing the number of holes; however, it is not known which strategy introduces larger energy traps that would hinder hole conductivity. Here we employ the small polaron model along with ab initio calculations on electrostatically embedded clusters to analyze the local trapping effects of iron vacancies and several substitutional p-type dopants that are soluble in FeO, including copper, nitrogen, lithium, and sodium, and also hydrogen as an interstitial dopant for comparison. We find that vacancies create stronger traps than dopants and that copper and nitrogen dopants form deeper traps than lithium, sodium, or. hydrogen. Furthermore, hydrogen repels the hole and substantially decreases the trap formed by an iron vacancy. Because of the shallower traps formed compared to vacancies, lithium-, sodium-, or hydrogen-doped, nanostructured or alloyed FeO may be worth evaluating as a p-type semiconductor for solar energy conversion applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据