4.6 Article

Structure and Dynamics of an Ionic Liquid Confined Inside a Charged Slit Graphitic Nanopore

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 27, 页码 14504-14513

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3041617

关键词

-

资金

  1. LONI Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular dynamics simulations were used to study the structure and dynamics of the ionic liquid (IL) [emim(+)][NTf2-] confined inside a slit graphitic nanopore of width H = 5.2 nm, where the pore walls have different densities of electrical charges. Previous simulation studies of similar systems have mainly focused on the structural and electrostatic properties of the confined IL, without studying in detail the dynamics of these systems. Our results indicate that the density of electrical charges sigma affects the structure and the dynamics of the confined IL, especially in the layer of ions close to the electrically charged walls. Increases in sigma in the pore walls lead to increases in the local density of counterions, as well as to important changes in the liquid structure of the ions, especially in the layers close to the pore walls. In particular, important differences in the g(r) functions are observed, and in the layer of ions near negatively charged walls, the ethyl groups of the cation cluster together to form small, nonpolar domains. Increases in sigma in the pore walls also induce important changes in the dynamics of the confined ions. In particular, as sigma is raised, important reductions in the z-component of the mean square displacements (MSDs) of the counterions in the layers near the pore walls are observed The ions in these layers exhibit slower relaxation times and strong deviations from Gaussian dynamics In general, the ions inside the pore move slower than the ions in the bulk IL; however, as sigma is raised, the parallel component of the MSD of the ions near the pore wall or in the center of the pore becomes comparable to and even larger than the MSD of the bulk ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据