4.6 Article

Optimizing Gold Nanoparticle Cluster Configurations (n ≤ 7) for Array Applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 115, 期 11, 页码 4578-4583

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp112146d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R01CA138509-02]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0853798, CBET-0953121]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0853798] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0953121] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticle duster arrays (NCAs) are novel electromagnetic materials whose properties depend on the size and shape of the constituent nanopartide clusters. A rational design of NCAs with defined optical properties requires a thorough understanding of the geometry-dependent optical response of the building blocks. Herein, we systematically investigate the near- and far-field responses of clusters of closely packed 60 nm gold nanoparticles (n <= 7) as a function of size and cluster geometry through a combination of experimental spectroscopy and generalized Mie theory calculations. From all of the investigated cluster configurations, nanoparticle trimers with D-3h geometry and heptamers in D-6h geometry stand out due to their polarization-insensitive responses and high electric (E) field intensity enhancements, making them building blocks of choice in this size range. The near-field intensity maximum of the D-6h heptamer is red-shifted with regard to the D-3h trimer by 125 nm, which confirms the possibility of a rational tuning of the near-field response in NCAs through the choice of the constituent nanoparticle clusters. For the nanoparticle trimer we investigate the influence of the cluster geometry on the optical response in detail and map near- and far-field spectra associated with the transition of the cluster configuration from D-3h into D-infinity h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据