4.6 Article

Porous Fe3O4/Carbon Core/Shell Nanorods: Synthesis and Electromagnetic Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 115, 期 28, 页码 13603-13608

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp202473y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072038, 21001035]
  2. NECT
  3. Outstanding Youth Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [JC201008]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China [F200828, E200839]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2008DFR20420]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HEUCFT1010, HEUCF20111127, HEUCF20111124, HEUCF101016]
  7. Harbin Key Sci-tech Project [2010AA4BG004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The porous Fe3O4/carbon core/shell nanorods were fabricated via a three-step process. alpha-Fe2O3 nanorods were first obtained, and alpha-Fe2O3/carbon core/shell nanorods were subsequently fabricated using glucose as a carbon source by a hydrothermal method, in which the thickness of the carbon coating was about 3.5 nm. Fe3O4/carbon core/shell nanorods were synthesized after an annealing treatment of the product above under a mixture of Ar/H-2 flow. After the H-2 deoxidation process, the Fe3O4 core exhibited a character of porosity; the thickness of the carbon shell was decreased to about 2.5 nm, and its degree of graphitization was enhanced. The interesting core/shell nanostructures are ferromagnetic at room temperature, and the Verwey temperature was about 120 K. Electromagnetic properties of the core/shell nanorod-wax composite were investigated in detail. The maximum reflection loss was about -27.9 dB at 14.96 GHz for the composite with a thickness of 2.0 mm, and the absorption bandwidth with the reflection loss below -18 dB was up to 10.5 GHz for the absorber with the thickness of 2-5 mm. The excellent electromagnetic wave absorption properties of the porous Fe3O4/carbon core/shell nanorods were attributed to effective complementarities between the dielectric loss and the magnetic loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据