4.6 Article

Novel Graphene-Gold Nanoparticle Modified Electrodes for the High Sensitivity Electrochemical Spectroscopy Detection and Analysis of Carbamazepine

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 115, 期 47, 页码 23387-23394

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp206945e

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNCS-UEFISCDI [PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0125]
  2. Arkansas Science and Technology Authority
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG36-06GO86072]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF/EPS-1003970]
  5. Office Of The Director
  6. EPSCoR [1003970] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel graphene-gold nanoparticle composite deposited on gold electrode (Au-Gr-AuNPs) was employed to detect carbamazepine (CBZ), an antiepileptic drug, used here as a model system. The same approach can also be used to detect other additional organic compounds. The presence of gold nanoparticles (size between 10 and 20 nm) encased in graphene sheets was evidenced by TEM and HRTEM, while the AFM analysis was used to study the morphology of the graphene-gold nanoparticle films used for the electrochemical studies. Various electrochemical methods were employed to study carbamazepine oxidation, such as cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results clearly showed that the modified electrode exhibited excellent electrocatalytic effect toward oxidation of carbamazepine. The peak current intensity significantly increased (up to 2 times) while the peak potential shifted to lower oxidation potential (similar to 100 mV), compared with the unmodified electrode. A detection limit (DL) of 3.03 x 10(-6) M was obtained with the graphene-gold nanoparticle-modified electrode (S/N = 3). In addition, an equivalent electrical circuit was developed and used to interpret the experimental EIS data. The circuit contains the solution resistance (R-s), the charge-transfer resistance (R-ct), the Warburg impedance (Z(Wt), transmissive boundary), and the double-layer capacitance (C-dl).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据