4.6 Article

Room Temperature Synthesis Routes to the 2D Nanoplates and 1D Nanowires/Nanorods of Manganese Oxides with Highly Stable Pseudocapacitance Behaviors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 115, 期 27, 页码 13171-13179

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp202041g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korean Government (MEST) [NRF-2010-C1AAA001-2010-0029065, 2010-0027517]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010K001087]
  3. MOST
  4. POSTECH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 2D nanoplates of delta-MnO2 and the ID nanowires/nanorods of alpha-MnO2 can be synthesized at room temperature via one-pot oxidation reaction of commercially available divalent manganese compounds. Treating the MnO or MnCO3 precursor with persulfate ions for 1-2 days yields layered delta-MnO2 2D nanoplates, whereas the same oxidation reaction for the MnSO4 precursor produces gamma-MnO2-structured 3D urchins. As the reaction time is extended for similar to 14-21 days, not only delta-MnO2 nanoplates but also gamma-MnO2 urchins are changed to well-separated ID nanostructured alpha-MnO2 materials with controllable diameters. According to N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm measurements and Mn K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscoyy, all the obtained manganate nanostructures show expanded surface areas of similar to S0-120 m(2) g(-1) the mixed oxidation state of Mn3+/Mn4+, respectively. All the present nanostructured manganese oxides exhibit pseudocapacitance behaviors with large specific capacitance and excellent capacitance retention, highlighting their promising functionality as a supercapacitor electrode. Among the materials under investigation, the delta-MnO2 2D nanoplates show the largest specific: capacitance (similar to 180-210 F g(-1)). The present finding clearly demonstrates that the room-temperature oxidation reaction of the MnO or MnCO3 precursor can provide a facile soft-chemical route to 2D delta-MnO2 nanoplates and ID alpha-MnO2 nanowires/nanorods with highly stable pseudocapacitance behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据