4.6 Article

Accurate Determination of the Index of Refraction of Polymer Blend Films by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 114, 期 35, 页码 15094-15101

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp104398f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Research Theme
  2. University Development Fund
  3. Small Project Grant and Outstanding Young Researcher Award
  4. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [HKBU202607]
  5. Hong Kong Baptist University [FRG/06-07/II-63]
  6. Croucher Foundation
  7. CityU [7002442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To model the performance of a bulk-heterojunction solar cell, it is necessary to obtain information about the index of refraction of the blend layer, which is typically determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry measurements. The optical functions of poly(3-hexylthiophene)-[6,6]-phenyl C-61-butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT-PCBM) blend films have been extensively studied. However, there is a large variation of the reported optical functions in the literature. Because of this fact, as well as the widespread use of P3HT-PCBM films in organic photovoltaics, we have selected this material system as an example and performed a detailed analysis of spectroscopic ellipsometry data. We illustrate the occurrence of multiple solutions and the importance of a dedicated methodology to reach a satisfactory unique solution. The proposed methodology involves the following steps: (1) multisample analysis; (2) independent thickness and surface characterization; (3) use of the adequate optical description of substrate; (4) thickness estimation from transparent range using Cauchy model; (5) fitting n and k in the entire range with fixed thickness; verify result is physically meaningful; (6) optimization of the parameters to be fitted; (7) repeating steps 5 and 6 with and without EMA layer to account for the surface roughness; (8) finally, and only if no satisfactory fit could be obtained from previous steps, attempts to introduce anisotropy, graded layers, or other nonideal models should follow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据