4.6 Article

Fluorescently Labeled Gold Nanoparticles with Minimal Fluorescence Quenching

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 114, 期 41, 页码 17446-17454

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp105516f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. Province of Saskatchewan
  4. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimal quenching of fluorescence emission was observed when the fluorescent dye AlexaFluor 514 (AF514) was covalently bound to gold monolayer protected clusters (AuMPCs) that have negligible plasmon bands (diameters <2 nm). The fluorescence emission of the conjugated (lye was measured as a function of dye-AuMPC mixing ratio with a combination of steady-state and time-resolved ensemble spectroscopic measurements in conjunction with single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescence emission of the conjugated samples decreased slightly as a function of dye mixing ratio, which, in combination with a negligible change in fluorescence lifetime, was attributed to static quenching of the dye by the AuMPCs. From the single-molecule fluorescence measurements, it was observed that luminescent conjugates could still be detected, and. at;ill loading ratios, almost all of the dye-particle conjugates photobleached in either a single- or double-step process, with a small subpopulation exhibiting more than two photobleaching events. Beyond simple, irreversible photobleaching, no additional blinking dynamics were detected at the single-molecule level within the time resolution of the experiment. Emission intensities of coupled fluorophores were comparable with those measured of dye molecules that had not been attached to the AuMPCs. suggesting that the statically quenched fluorophores arc entirely nonemissive, whereas the remaining dyes are essentially unquenched. These results are discussed in the context of other dye-AuMPC coupled systems described in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据