4.6 Article

DFT Study on Anatase TiO2 Nanowires: Structure and Electronic Properties As Functions of Size, Surface Termination, and Morphology

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 114, 期 29, 页码 12389-12400

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp9090987

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNISM
  2. MIUR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have performed first-principles calculations on anatase TiO2 nanowires (NWs) to investigate the dependence of their structural and electronic properties on the size, the surface coverage, and the morphology. We have found that the overall crystallinity of the NWs increases on increasing the diameter size or equivalently upon surface coverage with simple water-derived adsorbates. The NWs grown along the [010] direction are found to be more ordered with respect to the NWs in the [001] direction of the same size, thus highlighting the dependence of the crystallinity on the choice of the morphology. The bare and hydrated NWs do show the band gap blue shift due to the size confinement, but deviations from an ideal trend with the size are found and ascribed to the morphology and the crystallinity. Through the analysis of the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum energies we found that the electrochemical potential variations of the TiO2 NWs profit from the confined size, for example, by favoring the water splitting process. Moreover, the availability of internal channels for an efficient charge transport can be tuned by the surface coverage. The terminal hydroxyl groups of the hydrated NWs cannot be considered as deep hole traps since their related electronic states have binding energies in the same range of the NW oxygen states. The hydrogenated NWs grown along the [001] direction show occupied states at the bottom of the conduction bands, thus we expect that TiO2 NWs can be used as efficient hydrogen sensors. Finally, the surface hydration leads to the most stable NWs among the considered surface configurations with formation energies that are even close to the bulk limit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据