4.6 Article

Large-Cage Occupancies of Hydrogen in Binary Clathrate Hydrates Dependent on Pressures and Guest Concentrations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 114, 期 35, 页码 15218-15222

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp105379x

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences (DOE-BES) [DE-FG02-05ER46242]
  2. NSF-REMRSEC [DMR 0820518]
  3. DuPont
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22360410] Funding Source: KAKEN
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [0820518] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-05ER46242] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Balancing the formation and storage pressure with the storage capacity is one of the most significant steps toward developing H(2) storage in hydrates. The large-cage occupancies of hydrogen molecules in tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetone, cyclohexanone (CHONE), and methylcyclohexane (MCH) hydrates were investigated by Raman spectroscopy, volumetric gas release measurement, and X-ray diffraction analysis in a pressure region below the equilibrium pressure of pure H(2) hydrates at 255 +/- 2 K. The results from the measurements show that H(2) molecules occupy the large cage of the structure II THF+H(2), acetone+H(2), and CHONE+H(2) hydrates at the suitable pressures and concentrations of promoter guest species, while H(2) molecules do not occupy the largest cage of the structure H MCH+H(2) hydrates, even around 70 MPa. The present work reveals that the large-cage occupancy of H(2) strongly depends on the pressure and the concentration of promoter guest species. The maximum storage amount of H(2) in the acetone+H(2) hydrate was 3.6 +/- 0.1 wt %, similar to that of THF+H(2) hydrate, at 74 MPa and 255 +/- 2 K. Acetone is superior to THF and CHONE as the promoter based on the relation between pressure and the large-cage occupancy of H(2) molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据