4.6 Article

Dynamic Behavior of Interfacial Water at the Silica Surface

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 113, 期 45, 页码 19591-19600

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp906150n

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  3. OU Supercornputing Center for Education and Research (OSCER) at the University of Oklahoma
  4. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular dynamics simulations were employed to study the dynamic properties of water at the silica-liquid interface at ambient temperature. Three different degrees of hydroxylation of a crystalline silica surface were used, To assess the water dynamic properties we calculated the residence probability and in-plane meansquare displacement as a function of distance from the surface, The data indicate that water molecules at the fully hydroxylated surface remain longer, on average, in the interfacial region than in the other cases. By assessing the dynamics of molecular dipole moment and hydrogen-hydrogen vector an anisotropic reorientation was discovered for interfacial water in contact with any of the surfaces considered. However, the features of the anisotropic reorientation observed for water molecules depend strongly on the relative orientation of interfacial water molecules and their interactions with surface hydroxyl groups. On the partially hydroxylated surface, where water molecules with hydrogen-down and hydrogen-up orientation are both found, those water molecules associated with surface hydroxyl groups remain at the adsorbed locations longer and reorient more slowly than the other water molecules. A number of equilibrium properties, including density profiles, hydrogen bond networks, charge densities, and dipole moment densities, are also reported to explain the dynamics results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据