4.6 Article

Binary Ethanol-Methane Clathrate Hydrate Formation in the System CH4-C2H5OH-H2O: Phase Equilibria and Compositional Analyses

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 113, 期 28, 页码 12602-12607

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp9021536

关键词

-

资金

  1. Clariant Oil Services
  2. Petrobras
  3. StatoilHydro
  4. TOTAL
  5. UK Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethanol (EtOH) is commonly used as a gas hydrate inhibitor in hydrocarbon production operations. However, a number of stable and metastable hydrate phases have been reported for the binary EtOH-H2O system at temperatures of <223 K, including a structure II type clathrate hydrate stable below 198 K. Here, we present experimental DTA and PVT phase equilibrium data for the binary ethanol-water and ternary ethanol-methane-water systems, respectively. Binary DTA data confirm the appearance of metastable EtOH hydrates above the established structure II clathrate peritectic transition. In the ternary system with methane, at X-EtOH > 0.056, aqueous ethanol forms binary EtOH-CH4 clathrate hydrates stable over a wide PT range. In the HEtOH-CH4+L+G region, this results in significantly less hydrate inhibition than would be expected from ice melting point depression. In the ice region, ethanol enclathration actually increases hydrate stability relative to the methane-water system; the HEtOH-CH4+L+G region being bounded by a univariant HEtOH-CH4+L+I+G quadruple point locus line at temperatures much higher than the typical H-CH4+I+G boundary (or H-CH4+I+L+G quadruple point univariant locus in the presence of an aqueous hydrate inhibitor). Compositional analyses of the clathrate phase yields the formula 2.30CH(4)center dot 0.66EtOH center dot 17H(2)O at 246.7 K and 3.68 MPa, which is consistent with structure II. Independent powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopic studies presented in ail accompanying article in this journal issue confirm ethanol-methane clathrates to be of structure II type.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据