4.6 Article

Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes by ZnIn2S4 Microspheres under Visible Light Irradiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 113, 期 11, 页码 4433-4440

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp8092513

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20537010, 20677010, 20873023]
  2. MOST of China [2006AA03Z340]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB613306]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian, China [200317004, JA07001, 0330-033070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnIn2S4 microspheres were successfully synthesized by a hydrothermal method. A series of synthesis temperatures from 80 to 200 degrees C was investigated. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, UV-vis spectroscopy, nitrogen sorption analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results indicated that the crystalloid structure and optical property of temperature series products were almost the same. The specific surface area (S-BET) of ZnIn2S4 products declined with increasing synthesis temperature. The 80 degrees C sample had the largest S-BET (85.53 m(2) g(-1)). SEM images demonstrated that the morphology of ZnIn2S4 was marigold-like microspheres, and the 80 degrees C sample had a well-proportioned morphology. Several dyes (methyl orange, congo red, and rhodamine B) were applied in the ZnIn2S4 photocatalytic reactivity investigation. It showed efficient visible light photocatalytic degradation of dyes. A liquid chromatogram-mass spectrometer was used for identification of dyes and their degradation products. A large number of center dot OH radicals, investigated by the method of photoluminescence with terephthalic acid, were generated in the photocatalyst system. The results indicated that the center dot OH radicals played an important role in the superior visible photocatalytic activity of the ZnIn2S4 system. The mechanism related to the photocatalytic degradation was proposed and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据