4.6 Article

The Effect of a Common Purification Procedure on the Chemical Composition of the Surfaces of CdSe Quantum Dots Synthesized with Trioctylphosphine Oxide

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 114, 期 2, 页码 897-906

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp909492w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a quantitative analysis of the chemical composition of organic/inorganic interfaces of colloidal 3.1-nm CdSe quantum dots (QDs) synthesized with trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) as the coordinating solvent and Purified by successive precipitations from a chloroform/methanol solvent/nonsolvent system. A combination of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, inductively Coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy, and NMR (both H-1 and P-31) reveals that the only ligands that form a stable Population on the surface of the QDs ire X-type alkylphosphonate and carboxylate ligands. n-Octylphosphonate (OPA), a known impurity in technical-grade (90%) TOPO, and P'-P'-(di-n-octyl) pyrophosphonate (PPA), the self-condensation product of OPA, cover similar to 84% of the atoms on the Surface of the QDs, whereas few of the L-type (datively bound) ligands hexadecylamine (HDA), TOPO, and trioctylphosphine selenide (TOPSe) are present as bound ligands once the excess free surfactant is removed from the reaction Mixture. Purified QDs synthesized in 99% TOPO (with no alkylphosphonates present) have no phosphorus-containing ligands on the surface. Despite the approximately Constant Surface coverage of phosphorus-containing ligands, the photoluminescence quantum yield of the solution of QDs steadily decreases during purification from similar to 15% to less than 1%. Proton NMR analysis of the QD samples and photoluminescence spectra of QDs exposed to various concentrations of methanol suggest that this decrease is due to a combination of progressive loss of small amounts of HDA and adsorption of methanol to the surface of the QD during purification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据