4.6 Article

Electron Injection Efficiency and Diffusion Length in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Derived from Incident Photon Conversion Efficiency Measurements

期刊

Journal of Physical Chemistry C
卷 113, 期 3, 页码 1126-1136

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp809046j

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC Materials for Energy [EP/E035175/1]
  2. SUPERGEN [212792]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E035175/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/E035175/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Injection efficiency, eta(inj), and diffusion length, L, in dye-sensitized solar cells have been derived from the spectral response (incident photon to current efficiency, IPCE) of the cells under front side or backside illumination. Values of L from IPCE are found to be similar to 2 times shorter than the values of L derived from the normal small perturbation transient method. IPCE-derived values of L (2 to more than 40 mu m) and eta(inj) (63-90%) are found to correlate with the photocurrent (and indirectly with the photovoltage) of the different cells indicating the extent to which each factor limits the cell efficiency. IPCE spectra varied with light intensity, so that diffusion lengths derived from both methods show similar trends, e.g., L from IPCE is found to increase 3 times when the light intensity is increased 10 times up to approximately 0.1 sun where L tends to plateau or peak. The values for eta(inj) derived from the spectral response are shown to be in quantitative agreement with those determined from picosecond transient emission spectroscopy. To illustrate the utility of this method, L and eta(inj) were measured on cells with and without the TiCl(4) chemical bath treatment. The results show that the increase in photocurrent after the TiCl(4) treatment is due to around a 2-fold increase in L despite a 3-fold reduction in the electron diffusion coefficient. The increased L can be explained by a factor of 10 decrease in electron recombination rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据