4.6 Article

Thermodynamics of CVD Synthesis of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes: A Case Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 45-53

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp806102f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galvanic cells with CaF2 single crystal as electrolyte were utilized to determine the thermodynamic quantities of the solid-state process: delta NdNi5 (mu m) + MWCNT = {MWCNT-[NdNi5(nm)](delta)} where multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) react with NdNi5 which is the catalyst of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) synthesis of MWCNTs through the decomposition of a light hydrocarbon. It was shown elsewhere that the nucleation and growth of a MWCNT occurs by the nanodusting of the micrometer size powder of the unsupported catalyst. The composite {MWCNT-[NdNi5(nm)](delta)} is a nanoparticle of catalyst bonded to one of the ends of the MWCNT. The thermodynamic quantities of this process combined with those available for graphite to MWCNTs transformation and for decomposition of a light hydrocarbon, CH4, for instance, provide to obtain a complete picture of the thermodynamics of the CVD synthesis: CH4(g)+delta NdNi5(mu m) = {MWCNT-[NdNi5(nm)](delta)} + 2H(2)(g). At the standard state, the synthesis becomes feasible at T> 800 K. Between 300 and 1300 K, Delta H-r(T)theta and Delta S-r(T)theta are both positive, changing from 81 to 20 kJ mol(-1) and from 87 to 58 J K-1 mol(-1), respectively. To derive the thermodynamic quantities of formation of {MWCNT-[NdNi5(nm)](delta)}, the formation of NdNi5 was also studied by making use of a suitable CaF2 electrolyte cell. Between 600 and 1000 K, the formation of {MWCNT-[NdNi5(nm)](delta)} is always favored while Delta H-f(T)theta and Delta S-f(T)theta are positive but scarcely dependent on T (Delta H-f(T)theta approximate to 7 kJ mol(-1) Delta S-f(T)theta approximate to 12 J K-1 mol(-1)). A microscopic modeling of the process leading to the formation of {MWCNT-[NdNi5(nm)](delta) also been presented and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据