4.6 Article

Hydrogen Reduction of Adams' Catalyst in Ionic Liquids: Formation and Stabilization of Pt(0) Nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 112, 期 42, 页码 16463-16469

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp804870j

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. CT-PETRO
  4. TWAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetic data on cyclohexene hydrogenation with PtO2 (Adams' catalyst) dispersed in 1-n-butyl-3methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (BMI.BF4) and hexafluorophosphate (BMI.PF6) ionic liquids at room temperature and 75 degrees C, with substrate/catalyst ratios of 1/1000 and 1/4000, suggest the formation of large agglomerates of bulk metal catalysts. The results of this study show that the kinetic curves, which show induction periods in some cases, only have a good fit with the double autocatalytic mechanism, indicating the formation of bulk metal and its probable participation in the catalytic activity of the system, in particular at high precursor concentrations. However, it was not possible to observe these large agglomerates in the ionic liquids with the naked eye. In fact, in situ TEM analysis of several samples, including those obtained at the end of the induction period and at the end of the reaction, showed that only platinum nanoparticles with a mean diameter of around 3.0 nm were formed. Moreover, similar nanoparticle sizes were indicated by XRD analysis of isolated metal nanoparticles, suggesting that no bulk metal was formed. These results show that although the kinetic curves are consistent with a double autocatalytic mechanism, they do not seem to represent truly formation of large agglomerates of bulk metal. The direct application of such a mechanism is not appropriate for the formation of Pt(0) nanoparticles via salt metal reduction in imidazolium ionic liquids. Therefore, the nanoclusters of zerovalent platinum in imidazolium ionic liquids resulting from the reduction of the Adams' catalyst are mainly responsible for the high catalytic activity in the hydrogenation of olefins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据