4.5 Article

Local Structure Evolution and its Connection to Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate and Water Mixtures by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 10, 页码 3249-3263

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3001543

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation in China [20976004, 21176009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our recently developed improved united atom force field shows a good quality to reproduce both the static and transport properties of neat ionic liquids (ILs). Combined with the TIP4P-Ew water model, the force field is used to simulate the mixture of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([C(4)mim][BF4]) and water without further optimization to adjust any cross parameters. Liquid densities of the mixture are well predicted over the entire concentration range at temperatures from 298.15 to 353.15 K. Simulations also reproduce the positive values of excess volumes and excess enthalpies, as well as their increase with temperature. The simulated viscosities are in good agreement with experimental values, especially in the water-rich region. We found three distinct regions by analyzing the concentration dependent self-diffusion coefficients via Stokes-Einstein (SE) relation, indicating the mixture experiences significant microheterogeneity with the adding of water. This observation is well connected to the structure features obtained in simulations, such as radial distribution functions (RDFs), spatial distribution functions (SDFs) and water clustering analysis. At the water mole fraction (x(2)) less than 0.2, most of the water molecules are isolated in the polar cation-anion network in ionic liquids. With the increase of x(2) from 0.2 to 0.8, large water cluster forms and eventually percolates the whole system. When x(2) > 0.8, ionic liquids show a moderate degree of aggregation (with maximum around 0.9 to 0.95) before the cations and anions are fully dissolved in water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据