4.5 Article

Interaction of Thioflavin T with Amyloid Fibrils: Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Bound Dye

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 8, 页码 2538-2544

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp2083055

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Academy of Sciences
  2. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [12-04-90022_Bel]
  3. Dmitry Zimin's Russian Charitable Foundation Dynasty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzothiazole dye thioflavin T (ThT) is a sensitive probe for amyloid fibril detection. The ThT probing is based on its unique ability to form highly fluorescent complexes with amyloid and amyloid-like fibrils. In this work we propose an approach of ThT fluorescence quantum yield determination based on two key points: (1) fluorescence intensity (I) presentation as a multiple of two factors one of which the correcting factor (W) depends only on total optical density of solution, while the other is a multiple of optical density and fluorescence quantum yield of ThT bound to amyloid fibrils or their sum in the case of several binding modes (I = W Sigma D(bi)q(i)) and (2) sample and reference solutions preparation by equilibrium microdialysis. The last allows to determine the values of optical densities of free (D-f) and bound (D-b = Sigma D-bi) dye. Thereafter, fluorescence quantum yield (q(bi)) of ThT bound to sites of i binding mode can be determined by multiple linear regression. The fluorescence quantum yield of ThT molecules bound to the sites of two binding modes of lysozyme amyloid fibrils with high and low binding constants (7.5 x 10(6) and 5.6 x 10(4) M-1) was found equal to 0.44 and 5 x 10(-4), respectively. The higher value of fluorescence quantum yield is larger than that for ThT in rigid isotropic solution (0.28), whereas the lower value is comparable to that of ThT in aqueous solution (1 x 10(-4)). At the same time absorption spectra of ThT bound to these modes coincide (450 nm) and are red-shifted in comparison with that of free ThT in aqueous solution (412 nm).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据