4.5 Article

Thermodynamics-Hydration Relationships within Loops That Affect G-Quadruplexes under Molecular Crowding Conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 117, 期 4, 页码 963-972

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp308402v

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [2306]
  2. Hirao Taro Foundation of the Konan University Association for Academic Research
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24550200, 23651130, 24107525, 24655161] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We systematically investigated the effects of loop length on the conformation, thermodynamic stability, and hydration of DNA G-quadruplexes under dilute and molecular crowding conditions in the presence of Na+. Structural analysis showed that molecular crowding induced conformational switches of oligonucleotides with the longer guanine stretch and the shorter thymine loop. Thermodynamic parameters further demonstrated that the thermodynamic stability of G-quadruplexes increased by increasing the loop length from two to four, whereas it decreased by increasing the loop length from four to six. Interestingly, we found by osmotic pressure analysis that the number of water molecules released from the G-quadruplex decreased with increasing thermodynamic stability. We assumed that base-stacking interactions within the loops not only stabilized the whole G-quadruplex structure but also created hydration sites by accumulating nucleotide functional groups. The molecular crowding effects on the stability of G-quadruplexes composed of abasic sites, which reduce the stacking interactions at the loops, further demonstrated that G-quadruplexes with fewer stacking interactions within the loops released a larger number of water molecules upon folding. These results showed that the stacking interactions within the loops determined the thermodynamic stability and hydration of the whole G-quadruplex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据