4.5 Article

Calcium-43 NMR Studies of Polymorphic Transition of Calcite to Aragonite

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 49, 页码 14295-14301

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp309923p

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC 100-2628-M-002-009-MY3]
  2. Instrumental Center of National Taiwan University [NSC-100-2731-M-002-002-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase transformation between calcite and aragonite is an important issue in biomineralization. To shed more light on the mechanism of this process at the molecular level, we employ solid-state Ca-43 NMR to study the phase transformation from calcite to aragonite as regulated by magnesium ions, with Ca-43 enrichment at a level of 6%. Using the gas diffusion approach, the phase of Mg-calcite is formed initially and the system subsequently transforms to aragonite as the reaction time proceeds. Our Ca-43 solid-state NMR data support the dissolution-recrystallization mechanism for the calcite to aragonite transition. We find that the Ca-43 NMR parameters of Mg-calcite are very similar to those of pure calcite. Under the high-resolution condition provided by magic-angle spinning at 4 kHz, we can monitor the variation of the 43Ca NMR parameters of the aragonite signals for the samples obtained at different reaction times. Our data suggest that in the presence of a significant amount of Mg2+ ions, aragonite is the most stable polymorph of calcium carbonate. The initial precipitated crystallites of aragonite have spine-like morphology, for which the Ca-43 spin-lattice relaxation data indicate that the ions in the lattice have considerable motional dynamics. As the crystallinity of aragonite improves further, the Ca-43 T-1 parameter of the aragonite phase changes considerably and becomes very similar to that obtained for pure aragonite. For the first time, the difference in crystal morphologies and crystallinity of the aragonite phase has been traced down to the subtle difference in the motional dynamics at the molecular level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据