4.5 Article

Quantitative Nanoscale Analysis of IgE-FcεRI Clustering and Coupling to Early Signaling Proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 23, 页码 6923-6935

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp300197p

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01-AI018306, T32-GM08210, K99GM087810]
  2. Nanobiotechnology Center (NSF) [ECS9876771]
  3. Miller Independent Scientist Program of Cornell's Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
  4. Cornell's Tri-Institutional Training Program in Chemical Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antigen-mediated cross-linking of IgE bound to its receptor, Fc epsilon RI, initiates a transmembrane signaling cascade that results in mast cell activation in the allergic response. Using immunogold labeling of intact RBL mast cells and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we visualize molecular reorganization of IgE-Fc epsilon RI and early signaling proteins on both leaflets of the plasma membrane, without the need for ripped off membrane sheets. As quantified by pair correlation analysis, we observe dramatic changes in the nanoscale distribution of IgE-Fc epsilon RI after binding of multivalent antigen to stimulate transmembrane signaling, and this is accompanied by similar clustering of Lyn and Syk tyrosine kinases, and adaptor protein LAT. We find that Lyn co-redistributes with IgE-Fc epsilon RI into clusters that cross-correlate throughout 20 min of stimulation. Inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity reduces the numbers of both IgE-Fc epsilon RI and Lyn in stimulated clusters. Coupling of these proteins is also decreased when membrane cholesterol is reduced either before or after antigen addition. These results provide evidence for involvement of Fc epsilon RI phosphorylation and cholesterol-dependent membrane structure in the interactions that accompany IgE-mediated activation of RBL mast cells. More generally, this SEM view of intact cell surfaces provides new insights into the nanoscale organization of receptor-mediated signaling complexes in the plasma membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据