4.5 Article

Reversible Fluorescence Photoswitching in DNA

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 34, 页码 10290-10293

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3056834

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society [UF090182]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [RYC-2011-07637]
  3. MRC [MC_US_A024_0014]
  4. University of Edinburgh/University of Melbourne
  5. MRC [MC_U105178804] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Royal Society [UF090182] Funding Source: Royal Society
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178804] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the engineering of reversible fluorescence photoswitching in DNA with high-density substitution, and its applications in advanced fluorescence microscopy methods. High-density labeling of DNA with cyanine dyes can be achieved by polymerase chain reaction using a modified DNA polymerase that has been evolved to efficiently incorporate Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cytosine base analogues into double-stranded DNA. The resulting biopolymer, CyDNA, displays hundreds of fluorophores per DNA strand and is strongly colored and highly fluorescent, although previous observations suggest that fluorescence quenching at such high density might be a concern, especially for Cy5. Herein, we first investigate the mechanisms of fluorescence quenching in CyDNA and we suggest that two different mechanisms, aggregate formation and resonance energy transfer, are responsible for fluorescence quenching at high labeling densities. Moreover, we have been able to re-engineer CyDNA into a reversible fluorescence photoswitchable biopolymer by using the properties of the Cy3-Cy5 pair. This novel biopolymer constitutes a new class of photoactive DNA-based nanomaterial and is of great interest for advanced microscopy applications. We show that reversible fluorescence photoswitching in CyDNA can be exploited in optical lock-in detection imaging. It also lays the foundations for improved and sequence-specific super-resolution fluorescence microscopy of DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据