4.5 Article

Optimal Number of Coarse-Grained Sites in Different Components of Large Biomolecular Complexes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 29, 页码 8363-8374

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp2108895

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation through the Center for Multiscale Theory and Simulation [CHE-1136709]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1136709] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The computational study of large biomolecular complexes (molecular machines, cytoskeletal filaments, etc.) is a formidable challenge facing computational biophysics and biology. To achieve biologically relevant length and time scales, coarse-grained (CG) models of such complexes usually must be built and employed. One of the important early stages in this approach is to determine an optimal number of CG sites in different constituents of a complex. This work presents a systematic approach to this problem. First, a universal scaling law is derived and numerically corroborated for the intensity of the intrasite (intradornain) thermal fluctuations as a function of the number of CG sites. Second, this result is used for derivation of the criterion for the optimal number of CG sites in :different parts of a. large multibiomolecule complex. In the zeroth-order approximation, this approach validates the empirical rule of taking, one CG site per fixed number of atoms or residues in each biomolecule, previously widely used for smaller systems (e g, individual biomolecules). The first-order corrections to this rule are derived and numerically checked by the case studies of the Escherichia. colt ribosome and Arp2/3 actin filament junction. In different ribosomal. proteins, the optimal, number of amino acids per CG site. is shown to differ by a factor of 3.5, and an even wider spread may exist in other large biomolecular complexes. Therefore, the method proposed in this paper. is valuable for the optimal construction of CG Models of such complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据