4.5 Article

Molecular-Level Origins of Biomass Recalcitrance: Decrystallization Free Energies for Four Common Cellulose Polymorphs

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 115, 期 14, 页码 4118-4127

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp1106394

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE Office of the Biomass
  2. DOE Office of Science ASCR
  3. DOE Office of EERE [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  4. National Science Foundation [0955502]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0955502] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose is a crystalline polymer of beta 1,4-D-glucose that is difficult to deconstruct to sugars by enzymes. The recalcitrance of cellulose microfibrils is a function of both the shape of cellulose microfibrils and the intrinsic work required to decrystallize individual chains, the latter of which is calculated here from the surfaces of four crystalline cellulose polymorphs: cellulose I beta, cellulose I alpha, cellulose II, and cellulose IIII. For edge chains, the order of decrystallization work is as follows (from highest to lowest): I beta, I alpha, IIIb and II. For cellulose I beta, we compare chains from three different locations on the surface and find that an increasing number of intralayer hydrogen bonds (from 0 to 2) increases the intrinsic decrystallization work. From these results, we propose a microkinetic model for the deconstruction of cellulose (and chitin) by processive enzymes, which when taken with a previous study [Horn et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 18089] identifies the thermodynamic and kinetic attributes of enzyme and substrate engineering for enhanced cellulose (or chitin) conversion. Overall, this study provides new insights into the molecular interactions that form the structural basis of cellulose, which is the primary building block of plant cell walls, and highlights the need for experimentally determining microfibril shape at the nanometer length scale when comparing conversion rates of cellulose polymorphs by enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据