4.5 Article

Effect of Water and Temperature on Absorption of CO2 by Amine-Functionalized Anion-Tethered Ionic Liquids

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 115, 期 29, 页码 9140-9150

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp2015534

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FC26-07NT43091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amine-functionalized anion-tethered ionic liquids (ILs) trihexyl(tetradecyl) phosphonium asparaginate [P-66614] [Asn], glutaminate [P-66614] [Gln], lysinate [P-66614] [Lys], methioninate [P-66614] [Met], prolinate [P-66614] [Pro], taurinate [P-66614] [Tan], and threoninate [P-66614][Thr] were synthesized and investigated as potential absorbents for CO2 capture from postcombustion flue gas. Their physical properties, including density, viscosity, glass transition temperature, and thermal decomposition temperature were determined. Furthermore, the CO2 absorption isotherms of [P-66614] [Lys], [P-66614] [Tan], [P-66614][Pro] and [P-66614] [Met] were measured using a volumetric method, and the results were modeled with two different Langmuir-type absorption models. The most important result of this study is that the viscosity of [P-66614] [Pro] only increased by a factor of 2 when fully complexed with 1 bar of CO2 at room temperature. This is in stark contrast to the other chemically reacted ILs investigated here and all other amino acid-based ILs reported in the literature, which dramatically increase in viscosity, typically by 2 orders of magnitude, when complexed with CO2. The unique behavior of [P-66614] [Pro] is likely due to its ring structure, which limits the number and availability of hydrogen atoms that can participate in a hydrogen bonding network. We found that water can be used to further reduce the viscosity of the CO2-complexed IL, while only slightly decreasing the CO2 capacity. Finally, from temperature-dependent isotherms, we estimate a heat of absorption of -63 kJ/mol cif CO2 for the 1:1 reaction of CO2 with [P-66614] [Pro], when we use the two-reaction model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据