4.5 Article

Recursively Enriched Dynamic Combinatorial Libraries for the Self-Selection of Optimally Stable Proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 115, 期 10, 页码 2454-2464

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp111652n

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE 0106342]
  2. VT EPSCoR [EPS 0236976]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [0821501] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0907599] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even at very low template (guest) concentrations, the optimal template-assembled host from a dynamic combinatorial library (DCL) of host fragments may be unobtainable because hetero-oligomers will always be present at higher concentrations than isoenergetic homo-oligomers. Recursively enriched dynamic combinatorial libraries (REDCLs) offer a general solution to this problem that should be applicable to any self-selecting system under thermodynamic control. The utility of the RED CL strategy is demonstrated by determination of the optimal hydrophobic core packing in a template-assembled triple helical protein for which the template is a metal ion and the contributing host fragments are components of a 36-member conformationally restricted peptide library in which each peptide is augmented with a metal-binding moiety. Convergence of the 8436-member DCL to 5 optimal timers (0.06% of the DCL) is complete after four cycles of enrichment. The core packing of the optimal sequences is shown to be native-like, and to reflect the hydrophobic amino acid preferences found in natural parallel three-stranded coiled coils. The influence of potentially critical amino acids on the outcome of the recursive enrichment is explored in a second REDCL. The same peptide sequences were returned and were shown to populate seven of the 8436 possible trimers, or 0.08% of the DCL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据