4.5 Article

Distance and Temperature Dependency in Nonoverlapping and Conventional Forster Resonance Energy-Transfer

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 115, 期 46, 页码 13685-13694

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp205564n

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tekes, the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation
  2. Academy of Finland [119497, 140758]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [119497, 140758, 119497, 140758] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forster resonance energy-transfer (FRET) is a powerful and widely applied bioanalytical tool. According to the definition of FRET by Forster, for energy-transfer to take place, a substantial spectral overlap between the donor emission and acceptor excitation spectra is required. Recently also a phenomenon termed nonoverlapping FRET (nFRET) has been reported. The nFRET phenomenon is based on energy-transfer between a lanthanide chelate donor and a spectrally nonoverlapping acceptor and thus obviously differs from the conventional FRET, but the mechanism of nFRET and resulting implications to assay design have not been thoroughly examined. In this work, a homogeneous DNA-hybridization assay was constructed to study the distance and temperature dependency of both nFRET and conventional FRET. Capture oligonucleotides were labeled at the 5'-end with a Eu(III)-chelate, and these conjugates hybridized to complementary tracer oligonucleotides labeled with an organic fluorophore at various distances from the 3'-end. The distance dependency was studied with a fluorometer utilizing time-resolution, and the temperature dependency was studied using a frequency-domain (FD) luminometer. Results demonstrated a difference in both the distance and temperature dependency between conventional FRET and nFRET. On the basis of our measurements, we propose that in nFRET thermal excitation occurs from the lowest radiative state of the ion to a higher excited state that is either ionic or associated with a ligand-to-metal charge-transfer state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据